Por: Slate Politics June 08, 2023
You may have heard about the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. EPA that the Clean Water Act does not permit the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate the use of wetlands that are not connected at the surface to lakes, rivers, and streams. While there’s been plenty of analysis of the in the ruling—which will greatly restrict the ability of the EPA to protect not only wetlands but our entire freshwater system—less has been... + full article
The Boston Globe USA Nation May 26, 2023
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday curtailed the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to police millions of acres of wetlands, delivering another setback to the agency’s ability to combat pollution.Writing for five justices, Justice Samuel Alito said that... + más
EPA wants state to crack down on pollution during plant startups and shutdowns | The Advocate
Commentary: 12 climate wishes for the 12 days of Christmas | Portland Press Herald
ABC News USA Politics May 26, 2023
A sharply divided Supreme Court on Thursday significantly rolled back federal safeguards for wetlands under the , siding with Idaho property owners in a decision that curbs Environmental Protection Agency power.The case, Sackett v. EPA, pitted Michael and Chantell Sackett... + más
Supreme Court limits EPA’s power to address water pollution | The Boston Globe
Supreme Court scales back clean water protections. What does it mean for California? | Los Angeles Times
Time USA Politics May 25, 2023
(WASHINGTON) — The Supreme Court on Thursday made it harder for the federal government to police pollution in that are isolated from larger bodies of water. It’s the second decision in as many years in which a conservative majority of the court narrowed the reach of . The... + más
Supreme Court limits federal power over wetlands, boosts property rights over clean water | Portland Press Herald
Slate USA Politics May 25, 2023
On Thursday, the Supreme Court dealt a devastating blow to the nation’s wetlands by rewriting a statute the court does not like to mean something it does not mean. The court’s decision in is one of the its most egregious betrayals of textualism in memory. Put simply: The... + más
Supreme Court Ruling Strips Wetlands Protections From Clean Water Act | Time
Portland Press Herald USA World May 25, 2023
Chantell and Michael Sackett of Priest Lake, Idaho, pose for a photo in front of the Supreme Court in Washington on Oct. 14, 2011. Haraz N. Ghanbari/Associated Press. WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday made it harder for the federal government to police water... + más
Every NBA finals matchup and winner | ESPN
The Advocate USA Opinion May 09, 2023
Wetland loss in Louisiana is a serious issue that calls for immediate attention. at an alarming rate and this is having a devastating impact on our local ecosystem and the Louisianians who depend on it. The Wetlands Planning, Protecting And Restoration Act explain that a diverse... + más
On Day One, Ketanji Brown Jackson Excelled at the Skill Stephen Breyer Never Quite Mastered | Slate
Wetlands get treated as the ugly duckling of L.A.'s natural spaces. It's time to change that | Los Angeles Times
CNBC USA Politics October 25, 2022
Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) boards an elevator after walking off the floor of the U.S. Senate after a roll call vote to achieve cloture on the nomination of Judge Samuel Alito to the US Supreme Court passed 72 to 25 January 30, 2006 in Washington, DC.Chip Somodevilla Getty... + más
New book contains Chappaquiddick revelation from Ted Kennedy confidant | The Boston Globe
Alito Assured Ted Kennedy in 2005 of Respect for Roe v. Wade, Diary Says | The New York Times
About iurex | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer |