Por: ABC News Politics May 26, 2023
A sharply divided Supreme Court on Thursday significantly rolled back federal safeguards for wetlands under the , siding with Idaho property owners in a decision that curbs Environmental Protection Agency power.The case, Sackett v. EPA, pitted Michael and Chantell Sackett against EPA regulators over a bid to build a family home adjacent to Priest Lake in northern Idaho.The government said their land qualifies as a protected wetland, requiring an... + full article
Los Angeles Times USA Nation May 30, 2023
A California Department of Fish and Wildlife plan to introduce tidal flows into the Ballona Creek wetlands has come to a screeching halt after a judge ruled recently that the agency’s environmental impact report on the project failed to adequately account for flood risks. In a... + más
Wetlands get treated as the ugly duckling of L.A.'s natural spaces. It's time to change that | Los Angeles Times
Letters: Impact of wetlands loss devastating | The Advocate
Los Angeles Times USA Nation May 28, 2023
The Supreme Court’s landmark decision scaling back federal protections for many wetlands and streams has drawn criticism from scientists and environmental advocates, who say the gutting of safeguards will jeopardize water quality throughout the arid West. California's... + más
High school scores and top performers from Friday, March 24 | Orlando Sentinel
High school scores and top performers from Tuesday, March 28 | Orlando Sentinel
The Boston Globe USA Nation May 26, 2023
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday curtailed the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to police millions of acres of wetlands, delivering another setback to the agency’s ability to combat pollution.Writing for five justices, Justice Samuel Alito said that... + más
EPA wants state to crack down on pollution during plant startups and shutdowns | The Advocate
Commentary: 12 climate wishes for the 12 days of Christmas | Portland Press Herald
Los Angeles Times USA Politics May 25, 2023
The Supreme Court on Thursday limited federal protection for millions of acres of wetlands, ruling for property rights over clean water. In a 5-4 decision, the justices said the Clean Water Act does not forbid discharges of pollutants into marshy areas or dry creek beds because... + más
Time USA Politics May 25, 2023
(WASHINGTON) — The Supreme Court on Thursday made it harder for the federal government to police pollution in that are isolated from larger bodies of water. It’s the second decision in as many years in which a conservative majority of the court narrowed the reach of . The... + más
Supreme Court scales back clean water protections. What does it mean for California? | Los Angeles Times
Supreme Court limits federal power over wetlands, boosts property rights over clean water | Portland Press Herald
CBS News USA Politics May 25, 2023
Washington — The Supreme Court on Thursday curtailed the Environmental Protection Agency's authority to regulate certain wetlands that qualify as waters of the United States under the Clean Water Act, curbing what has long been seen as a key tool to protect waterways from... + más
Supreme Court limits EPA’s power to address water pollution | The Boston Globe
Supreme Court Ruling Strips Wetlands Protections From Clean Water Act | Time
Los Angeles Times USA Life February 02, 2023
Happy World Wetlands Day from the driest big city in the world. OK, that’s not true. We may think of our city as arid, but Los Angeles harbors its very own rich wetlands (plus, Yuma beats us on aridity any year). The Ballona Wetlands Ecological Reserve, between Playa del Rey... + más
On Day One, Ketanji Brown Jackson Excelled at the Skill Stephen Breyer Never Quite Mastered | Slate
'Frustration' fuels Broncos' sideline blowup in loss | ESPN
About iurex | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer |