Por: NBC News Politics May 26, 2023
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday significantly weakened a landmark water pollution law by ruling that an Idaho couple's property does not include wetlands subject to federal oversight under the law. The ruling, in which all the justices agreed in the outcome but differed on the legal reasoning, concluded that Mike and Chantell Sackett's land does not fall under jurisdiction of the 1972 Clean Water Act, so they do not... + full article
Los Angeles Times USA Nation May 30, 2023
A California Department of Fish and Wildlife plan to introduce tidal flows into the Ballona Creek wetlands has come to a screeching halt after a judge ruled recently that the agency’s environmental impact report on the project failed to adequately account for flood risks. In a... + más
Wetlands get treated as the ugly duckling of L.A.'s natural spaces. It's time to change that | Los Angeles Times
Letters: Impact of wetlands loss devastating | The Advocate
Los Angeles Times USA Nation May 28, 2023
The Supreme Court’s landmark decision scaling back federal protections for many wetlands and streams has drawn criticism from scientists and environmental advocates, who say the gutting of safeguards will jeopardize water quality throughout the arid West. California's... + más
High school scores and top performers from Friday, March 24 | Orlando Sentinel
High school scores and top performers from Tuesday, March 28 | Orlando Sentinel
The Boston Globe USA Nation May 26, 2023
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday curtailed the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to police millions of acres of wetlands, delivering another setback to the agency’s ability to combat pollution.Writing for five justices, Justice Samuel Alito said that... + más
EPA wants state to crack down on pollution during plant startups and shutdowns | The Advocate
Commentary: 12 climate wishes for the 12 days of Christmas | Portland Press Herald
ABC News USA Politics May 26, 2023
A sharply divided Supreme Court on Thursday significantly rolled back federal safeguards for wetlands under the , siding with Idaho property owners in a decision that curbs Environmental Protection Agency power.The case, Sackett v. EPA, pitted Michael and Chantell Sackett... + más
Supreme Court limits EPA’s power to address water pollution | The Boston Globe
Supreme Court scales back clean water protections. What does it mean for California? | Los Angeles Times
Time USA Politics May 25, 2023
(WASHINGTON) — The Supreme Court on Thursday made it harder for the federal government to police pollution in that are isolated from larger bodies of water. It’s the second decision in as many years in which a conservative majority of the court narrowed the reach of . The... + más
Supreme Court limits federal power over wetlands, boosts property rights over clean water | Portland Press Herald
Slate USA Politics May 25, 2023
On Thursday, the Supreme Court dealt a devastating blow to the nation’s wetlands by rewriting a statute the court does not like to mean something it does not mean. The court’s decision in is one of the its most egregious betrayals of textualism in memory. Put simply: The... + más
Supreme Court Ruling Strips Wetlands Protections From Clean Water Act | Time
Portland Press Herald USA World May 25, 2023
Chantell and Michael Sackett of Priest Lake, Idaho, pose for a photo in front of the Supreme Court in Washington on Oct. 14, 2011. Haraz N. Ghanbari/Associated Press. WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday made it harder for the federal government to police water... + más
Every NBA finals matchup and winner | ESPN
About iurex | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer |